Hyperliquid vs Aster fees
Hyperliquid charges 0.015% maker and 0.045% taker on perpetual futures. Aster charges 0.000% maker and 0.040% taker. The tables below compare their published entry-tier fees, live BTC funding when available, and example monthly costs. Your result can change with volume, order mix, and discounts.
Rates, product coverage, and discount conditions are below. Run the matching profile in the FeeEdge calculator. How the books are sourced is on the methodology page.
Fee comparison
| Perps maker | 0.015%† | 0.000% |
| Perps taker | 0.045%† | 0.040% |
| Spot maker | 0.040% | 0.005% |
| Spot taker | 0.070% | 0.040% |
Rates shown are published base-tier estimates and may change, so always confirm on the exchange. Maker = limit orders that add liquidity (cheaper); taker = market orders that remove it.
† Hyperliquid: The calculator estimates the 14-day qualifying volume from 30-day volume assuming evenly distributed trading. Hyperliquid spot volume counts twice. Monthly costs still use the full 30-day volume. Confirm actual eligibility in your account.
Which is cheaper?
At $100k in monthly volume with an even maker/taker split, Aster costs $20.00/month, about $10.00 less on perpetual futures. On spot, Aster costs $22.50/month, about $32.50 less. These examples use published entry-tier rates before funding, volume tiers, maker rebates, and native-token discounts.
Monthly cost examples
| Profile | Hyperliquid | Aster | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Perps · $25k/month · 25% maker | $9.38 | $7.50 | $1.87 |
| Perps · $250k/month · 50% maker | $75.00 | $50.00 | $25.00 |
| Spot · $25k/month · 50% maker | $13.75 | $5.63 | $8.13 |
Those $25k and $250k cases are ranked across every venue on the $25k/month and $250k/month profiles.
Trading-fee estimates only. Perpetual-futures funding, spread, slippage, and withdrawal costs are separate.
Current BTC perpetual funding
| Exchange | Rate per 8h | Simple annualized rate |
|---|---|---|
| Hyperliquid | +0.0100% | +11.0% |
| Aster | +0.0050% | +5.5% |
At this snapshot, Aster has the lower recorded funding rate for a long position. Positive funding usually means longs pay shorts; negative funding means shorts pay longs. Rates can change before the next settlement. A missing cell means FeeEdge has no BTC perpetual snapshot for that venue, not a zero rate.
Funding last refreshed Oct 6, 2026, 11:16 PM UTC. BTC perpetual only.
Official fee sources
Trading-fee verification: Hyperliquid August 31, 2026. Aster August 31, 2026. Token-discount last check: August 17, 2026. Fee schedules can vary by product, region, promotion, and account tier. Check the exchange page before placing a trade.
If a venue publishes a split token cut, the futures figure applies to perpetual fees. The spot figure does not.
Want the full picture on either venue? See Hyperliquid fees and Aster fees.
Open an account
These are affiliate links, and FeeEdge may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
FAQ
Is Hyperliquid cheaper than Aster?
On base-tier perpetual futures, Aster has the lower taker fee (0.045% vs 0.040%). On spot, Aster has the lower taker fee (0.070% vs 0.040%). Your actual cheapest venue depends on your monthly volume and maker/taker mix, so check it in the calculator.
What are Hyperliquid's trading fees?
Hyperliquid charges roughly 0.015% maker / 0.045% taker on perps and 0.040% maker / 0.070% taker on spot at the entry tier.
What are Aster's trading fees?
Aster charges roughly 0.000% maker / 0.040% taker on perps and 0.005% maker / 0.040% taker on spot at the entry tier.